The Anti-Pornography Law1

Everyday since last week several journalists have been ringing my cellphone, asking me what I think about the new draft about anti-pornography (don’t ask me why).

“Have you read the draft?” they said. “Well, yeah, since you guys never stop asking about it.” I answered. “How do you react to it? “It’s stupid.” There was then a long pause. “And…?” they asked. Then, there was a long pause again. I was madly trying to find a more intelligent answer. I said: “It’s… stupid.” I don’t know why they kept calling me.

If the draft becomes law, it will be unlawful to portray people kissing on films. Inul may also be out of job. Since it’s ridiculous to set a standard which act makes people horny or not, we will have to be careful to do anything since it may be sexually arousing to people. I know my friends in high school got aroused when watching my biology teacher writing on the white board. She may have to quit her job. Wait. I think she already quitted and began sending women to work in an Arab country.

Why some people have problem with people kissing? It’s an act of love. It’s just love. What are they so afraid of? In fact, why some people have to have problem with pornography? Pornography’s good. If I don’t browse naked pictures or read sex stories and masturbate to them, I would go ballistic. I would want to smash things. I would want to break some glass. I would want to kick people’s asses in the office. I release my tension by jerking off. Thanks to those pornographic material, jerking off sessions feel better. So pornography’s good. It’s not like they make me want to rape somebody, or some thing. And who says Inul’s dance is sexually arousing? My straight male friends never jerk off after watching Inul (at least, not that I know of). Who says all naked pictures are pornographic? If they are, so what?

See why I can’t say that to the journalists?